|
|
ONLINE 17-MAR-00
|
Universities take various actions against
notes sites by OLIVIA ALLISON
THRESHER EDITORIAL STAFF
Several universities have taken action against Versity.com, a Web
site that recruits and pays students for lecture notes for
university classes, which are posted online.
Yale University sent a cease-and-desist letter to Versity Feb. 25
asking them to pull all notes from Yale courses off the site. The
notes were removed from the site that day, Yale Director of Public
Affairs Lawrence Haas said.
"There were about three dozen courses on the site. We heard
complaints from several faculty members, and within a couple of
weeks we were taking action," Haas said.
Haas said posting these notes on the Web site without the
permission of the university and faculty violates intellectual
property laws. Also, "students are not permitted to engage in
commercial ventures as part of their campus activities without
permission from the administration," he said.
"There is something special about Yale and other top
universities, Rice included, and it is a question of fairness as to
whether this education, which is coming at considerable cost, should
be available to anyone with a computer," Haas said.
The University of California at Berkeley also sent a
cease-and-desist letter to Versity, Berkeley Executive Vice
Chancellor and Provost Carol Christ said.
"We don't allow unauthorized commercial enterprise on our
campus," she said. "We will have a meeting with Versity.com in two
weeks. ... They do not currently have permission to post our
university's class notes and this will not change at all."
The Berkeley Campus Code of Student Conduct prohibits students
from selling their lecture notes. The code outlaws "selling or
distributing course lecture notes" and "using [the notes] for any
commercial purpose without the express permission of the
instructor."
Rice Associate General Counsel Carlos Garcia said he believes
that, as these types of commercial note-taking practices expand,
universities will primarily address the issue as a student conduct
issue rather than a legal issue.
"If you make it a student conduct issue, at that point it is not
a legal issue and [banning students from selling their notes] is an
effective way to deal with the problem," Garcia said.
The Columbia University Committee on Instruction agreed on a
policy prohibiting students from selling syllabi, exams or class
notes, according to the March 9 issue of the Columbia Daily
Spectator, the Columbia student newspaper.
Janet Cardinell, Director of University Relations at Versity.com,
said most universities have not complained about the site.
"In more than 90 percent of the universities we work with, no
changes have ever been requested," Cardinell said.
One professor's campaign
Purdue University Sociology Professor Mathieu Deflem began a
personal Web site against these types of Web sites when he learned
about Versity in September 1999.
"I was kind of offended because it is intruding on my work and on
students' work," Deflem said. "This campaign is just me, I update it
a couple times a week, look up articles, gather information and
write about it."
The site, "Free Education Now!" at
www.sla.purdue.edu/people/soc/mdeflem/education.htm, has received
over 4,500 hits.
Deflam's site includes links to five information sites and two
position papers. One of the information site links lists all of the
13 national sites that currently provide notes for students,
including small regional sites.
Deflem also writes letters and opinion pieces for various
universities' student papers.
Although Deflem said Purdue does not currently have any policies
against these kinds of sites, no student has ever submitted notes to
Versity for any of his classes.
Deflem said he is so concerned about this issue because as a
student, he would have been attracted by this type of site.
"I'm so passionate [about this] because I nearly flunked out and
eventually became a professor," Deflem said. "I oppose this because
these sites don't encourage students to think, and students get
sucked in without understanding the implications."
The history of these sites
The three major sites that provide notes for students are
Study24-7.com, Versity and StudentU.com. Of the major sites, only
Versity provides notes for Rice classes.
Study24-7.com was the first such site, founded in December 1997
and online in January 1999. The site currently has about 370
universities' notes.
Brian Maser, co-founder and co-CEO of Study24-7.com, said that
while Versity has recently been forced to remove Yale and Berkeley's
notes off its page, Study24-7.com has only received a few
complaints, including one from Deflem, in the entire time the site
has been online.
Maser said that the main difference between Study24-7.com and
Versity is that Study24-7.com does not actively recruit students.
Maser said the main feature of the Study24-7.com site is
discussion, not the actual lecture notes, which better protects the
company from copyright laws. Both students and professors can post
lecture notes, and payment is based on how many participants use the
discussion site.
"We have a discussion group, called a Virtual Classroom
Connection, in which students can discuss their interpretations, and
therefore we're not doing anything wrong," Maser said. "We involve
professors, and you can't say someone can't publish their own
material."
Versity's site had the URL www.notes4free.com when it was founded
in 1997, but the name was later switched to Versity.com. The site
has about 150 schools' courses on its Web site.
Cardinell said the difference between Versity and other online
note-taking companies is that it is "solely dedicated to being an
online academic resource for college students."
"The company's goal is to collaborate with educators and students
to deliver online course materials that meet academic standards for
faculty instruction and advance the learning process for students,"
Cardinell said.
- back
-
Search the Thresher
pages:
Copyright © 2000 The Rice Thresher.
All Rights Reserved. This document may be distributed
electronically, provided that it is distributed in its entirety and
includes this notice. However, it cannot be reprinted without the
express written permission of: The Rice Thresher, Rice
University MS-524, PO Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251-1892, USA.
The Thresher Online Project -- ethresh@listserv.rice.edu |